ABSTRACT
Covid-19 salgınının ortaya çıkmasından sonra dünya çapında ekonomik çalkantılar ve şiddetli piyasa düşüşlerinin ortaya çıktığı görülmüştür. Bu dönemde hisse senedi piyasalarına yatırım yapmış ajanlar için hedge ve/veya güvenli liman araçları arayışları artmıştır. Kripto paralar ve altın özellikle gelişmekte olan ülke piyasalarındaki yatırımcılar için hedge ve/veya güvenli liman olma konusunda iyi potansiyellere sahiptir. Bu çalışmada, Borsa Ístanbul için Bitcoin, Etherium, Ripple, Litecoin ve altın piyasalarının hedge ve/veya güvenli liman piyasalar olup olmadığı, GARCH(1,1) hata terimleri varsayımı altında modellenmiş regresyon sistemi yardımı ile araştırılmıştır. Analizlerde örneklem olarak 4 Eylül 2017 – 30 Mart 2022 tarihleri arasındaki günlük frekanslı verilerden faydalanılmıştır. Ayrıca, Covid-19 salgın dönemi etkilerini ayrıştırmak için örneklem iki alt gruba ayrılmış ve tahminler Covid-19 öncesi dönem (31 Aralık 2019 öncesi) ve Covid-19 dönemi (31 Aralık 2019 ve sonrası) için ayrı ayrı analiz edilmiştir.A.B.D. doları cinsinden elde edilmiş kripto para (BTC, ETH, XRP, LTC), altın ve BÍST100 endeks getirileri kullanılarak bulunan tahmin sonuçlarına göre, tüm örneklem için Litecoin zayıf güvenli liman olarak ortaya çıkarken, Covid-19 öncesi dönemde Bitcoin ve Etherium zayıf hedge, Covid-19 salgın döneminde de Etherium zayıf güvenli liman olma özellikleri göstermektedir. Tüm örneklem ve salgın öncesi dönem verileri söz konusu olduğunda, BÍST100 endeks getiri dağılımının %10 çeyrek değerinden az olduğu durumlarda Bitcoin, Etherium ve Ripple güvenli liman piyasalar olarak gözlemlenirken, salgın döneminde altın, BÍST100 endeks getiri dağılımının %1 çeyrek değerinden az olduğu durumlarda güvenli bir liman olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. Fakat tüm analizlere dayanarak, altının genel görünümüyle BÍST100 endeksi için hedge veya güvenli limandan çok bir çeşitlendirici varlık olarak öne çıktığı söylenebilir.Alternate :After the Covid-19 outbreak, economic turmoil and severe market crashes have been observed around the world. During this crisis period, cyriptocurrencies and gold have become potentially good hedge and/or safe haven assets for especially the stock investors in emerging markets. This study investigates whether or not Bitcoin, Etherium, Ripple, Litecoin and gold markets have hedge and/or safe-haven properties for Borsa Ístanbul through a regression system modeled under the assumption of GARCH(1,1) error terms. Daily frequency data covering the period September 4, 2017 through March 30, 2022 is used in the sample analysis. In addition, to separate out the effects of the Covid-19 pandemic on the analysis, full sample is divided into two subgroups and the estimations are made separately for the pre-Covid-19 period (before 31 December 2019) and the Covid-19 period (31 December 2019 and later).According to the estimation results, Litecoin emerges as a weak safe haven for Borsa Ístanbul over the entire sample period, while Bitcoin and Etherium appear to be weak hedges in the pre-pandemic period. During the Covid-19 pandemic period, Etherium is shown to be a weak safe haven for the BÍST100 index. Full sample and pre-pandemic data analysis reveal that, Bitcoin, Etherium and Ripple act as safe-haven markets in some cases when the BÍST100 index returns hit lower than their 10% quantile value. After the outburst of the Covid-19 however, gold seems to act as a safe haven asset for Borsa Ístanbul when the BÍST100 index returns hit lower than their 1% quantile value. Based on the overall estimation results, gold stands out as a diversifier rather than a hedge and/or a safe haven asset for the BÍST100 index.
ABSTRACT
Bitcoin has become quite known after the 2008 economic crisis and the COVID-19 health crisis. For some, these cryptocurrencies constitute rebellion against the existing system as governments encourage uncontrolled expansions in the money supply;for some others, it is a quick source of income. Undeniably, the volume of the crypto money market has grown considerably in recent years, regardless of the reasoning of the people who invest and trade in this field. At this point, one of the most important questions to be investigated is "what variables have caused the tremendous growth in the crypto money quantities in recent years?" This study tests the assumption that changes in cryptocurrencies are affected by changes in national currencies. Thus, the Bitcoin price is the dependent variable, and M1 monetary supply changes in the USA, European Union and Japanese economies are considered independent variables. The variables in this study were tested using the time-varying Granger causality method. The results obtained from this study confirm the philosophy of Bitcoin's emergence and the possibility that it can be a hedge against the inflationary effects of money, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic.
ABSTRACT
Covid-19 has led to major changes worldwide and has had a significant impact on market risk. We characterize this uncertainty as innovations extracted from the Covid Risk Index on the Wall Street Journal through a textual analysis of high-dimensional data. We hedge the risk with mimicking portfolios constructed using the ESG (environmental, social, and governance) disclosure score as a measure of firm-level exposure to Covid-19 risk. The hedge portfolios perform well both in and out of sample. We also test the role of ESG in hedging and discover that during the Covid-19 pandemic firms with greater ESG disclosure generate higher returns as well as experience lower downside risk. The further analysis suggests that the portfolio returns can be explained by Covid risk shock and investment inflow, and the hedge effect mainly comes from the social part of ESG.
ABSTRACT
In this paper, we investigate whether investors can reap potential diversification or hedging benefits from holding green bonds in a portfolio containing a conventional financial asset during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using data from 6 November 2014 to 5 November 2020, we estimate corrected dynamic conditional correlation between between green bonds and four major asset classes: stocks, corporate bonds, commodities, and clean energy. We extend our analysis by using these correlations to examine hedging, optimal portfolio weights, and naïve strategies and evaluate their implications for investors by calculating hedging effectiveness and utility gain improvement. Results reveal that across the full sample, pre-COVID-19, and during-COVID-19 periods, optimal portfolio weights represent an ideal strategy to realize the greatest risk reduction and risk-adjusted return. Further, green bonds could add substantial diversification benefits for investors holding assets in clean energy, global stocks, and commodities.
ABSTRACT
We test the hedge property of non-fungible token (NFT) coins against equity market fluctuations and compare it with the hedge property of Bitcoin. We employ daily the returns of Bitcoin;three NFT coins, namely Theta, Enjin Coin and Decentraland, and three equity market indices: S&P 500, NASDAQ and CAC 40, ranging from 18 January 2018 to 12 January 2021. We estimate the hedge effectiveness of the three NFT coins and Bitcoin against stock market fluctuations. Our results suggest that NFT coins are a better hedge against equity market fluctuations than Bitcoin.
ABSTRACT
This paper examines whether green assets can hedge against economic policy uncertainty (EPU) via asymmetric time-varying connectedness and EGARCH models. Using daily data in China spanning from March 2014 to June 2022, we find that (1) an evident asymmetric connectedness exists between green assets and EPU. (2) Green bond, carbon emission allowances and some green stocks can act as hedging or safety-haven assets against EPU, and the conclusion remains robust to an alternative proxy of EPU. (3) The minimum variance and connectedness portfolios provide superior performance during pre- and post-COVID-19 periods, respectively, thereby carrying substantial portfolio implications. © 2023 Elsevier Inc.
ABSTRACT
By assuming that a risk-neutral hedge fund manager has ambiguous beliefs about the return process of risky asset, we study his robust risk choice under the high-water mark. The results show that without management fees, ambiguity aversion induces the manager to take more risk as the fund is close to the termination but take less risk as the fund approaches the high-water mark. With management fees, ambiguity aversion increases the induced risk aversion and moderates the manager's incentive to take risk, predicting that it is the manager with higher rates of management fees that reduces the risky asset holdings more when he becomes less confident and/or more pessimistic about the future returns. The model implies that managers' ambiguity aversion is a possible factor explaining hedge fund activities in stock markets during the financial crisis of 2007–2009 and in US Treasury markets during COVID-19 crisis. Finally, taxation is taken into account. © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
ABSTRACT
This study investigates the risk spillover effect between the exchange rate of importing and exporting oil countries and the oil price. The analysis is supported by the utilization of a set of double-long memories. Thereafter, a multivariate GARCH type model is adopted to analyze the dynamic conditional correlations. Moreover, the Gumbel copula is employed to define the nonlinear structure of dependence and to evaluate the optimal portfolio. The conditional Value-at-Risk (CoVaR) is adopted as a risk measure. Findings indicate a long-run dependence and asymmetry of bidirectional risk spillover among oil price and exchange rate and confirm that the risk spillover intensity is different between the former and the latter. They show that the oil price has a stronger spillover effect in the case of oil exporting countries and the lowest spillover effect in the case of oil importing countries.
ABSTRACT
This study follows Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) to examine the existing literature on the connectedness of green bonds with other markets as an attempt to highlight the effectiveness of green bonds in risk management and the benefits associated with incorporating green bonds in investment portfolios. An extensive search of relevant research papers to the scope of the review led to the identification of 31 articles published by February 2022. Our analysis traces the evolution of studies on green bonds' interactions with other markets, the methodologies and data frequencies used for cross-market relations analysis, and the role of green bonds in portfolio risk management (diversifier, hedge, and safe-haven) in normal and extreme market conditions. The study reports several interesting findings. First, green bonds can be a strategic safe-haven avenue for investors in stocks, dirty energy stocks, and the foreign exchange market in the US and China in extreme market downturns. Second, green bonds demonstrated hedging properties against spillovers from Bitcoin, forex, soft commodities, and CO2 emission allowance. Third, the role of green bonds in the markets of natural gas, industrial metals, and crude oil is limited to a portfolio diversifier in different investment horizons. Fourth, green bonds had no diversification or hedge benefits for investors in conventional bonds. Fifth, the interrelationships between green bonds and most markets' understudy were influenced by macroeconomic and global factors such as the COVID-19 pandemic, economic policy uncertainty, OVX, and VIX. Our review of the literature also facilitated identification of future research topics. The outcome of the review offers insightful information to investors in green bonds in risk management and assets allocation. Policy makers can benefit from this review in effective policy legislation for the advancement of the green bonds market and acceleration of a smooth transition to a net zero emission economy.
ABSTRACT
PurposeThe study aims to examine the relationship among economic policy uncertainty (EPU), geopolitical-risks (GPR), the interaction (EPGR) of EPU and GPR and the returns of gold, silver, platinum, palladium and rhodium using monthly data from January (1997) to May (2021).Design/methodology/approachThe paper employs the Markov-switching and the novel Shi et al. (2020) bootstrap time-varying Granger-causality approach.FindingsThough the Markov-switching shows variation in the responses of precious metals to EPU, GPR and EPGR across low and high states, the paper observes the safe-haven potential of the precious metals in the high regime while the hedging potency is also evident in the results. To further substantiate the safe-haven and hedging properties, the time-varying Granger-causality shows the causal effect of EPU on all the selected precious metal returns coinciding with global events. While the authors show that GPR Granger causes platinum, palladium and rhodium consistently under the rolling/recursive-evolving tests, the authors cannot find the causal effect of GPR on gold and silver returns across the algorithms. The paper also observes persistence in the causal effect of EPGR on palladium and platinum across all the algorithms, while gold and rhodium only show consistency in the responses under the rolling- and recursive-evolving algorithms given the conditions of homoscedasticity and heteroscedasticity.Practical implicationsThe authors' results are essential to investors and policymakers since both typically leverage the hedging and safe-haven characteristics of precious metals to obviate downside risks during highly uncertain periods.Originality/valueThe authors' techniques allow examining the hedging and safe-haven properties of precious metals across regimes and date-stamp critical periods of causation inherent in the relationship.
ABSTRACT
PurposeThis study aims to examine the hedge and safe-haven properties of the Sukuk and green bond for the stock markets pre- and during the COVID-19 pandemic period.Design/methodology/approachTo test the hedge and safe-haven characteristics of Sukuk and green bonds for stock markets, the study first uses the methodology proposed by Ratner and Chiu (2013). Next, the authors estimate the hedge ratios and hedge effectiveness of using Sukuk and green bonds in a portfolio with stock markets.FindingsStrong safe-haven features of ethical (green) bonds reveal that adding green bonds into the investment portfolios brings considerable diversification avenues for the investors who tend to take fewer risks in periods of economic stress and turbulence. The hedge ratio and hedge effectiveness estimates reveal that green bonds provide sufficient evidence of the hedge effectiveness for various international stocks.Practical implicationsThe study has significant implications for faith-based investors, ethical investors, policymakers and regulatory bodies. Religious investors can invest in Sukuk to relish low-risk and interest-free investments, whereas green investors can satisfy their socially responsible motives by investing in these investment streams. Policymakers can direct the businesses to include these diversifiers for portfolio and risk management.Originality/valueThe study provides novel insights in the testing hedge and safe-haven attributes of green bonds and Sukuk while using unique methodologies to identify multiple low-risk investors for investors following the uncertain COVID-19 pandemic.
ABSTRACT
This paper investigates alternatives to the conventional minimum-variance framework for hedging equity risks with crude oil. Specifically, the optimal hedge ratios are calculated for various risk objectives such as volatility, semivariance, and tail risk. The hedging efficacy is assessed for BRIC stocks and aggregated market indices. The results show that the optimal hedge ratios differ by strategy, and hedging efficacy varies across risk metrics, equity indices, and time periods. Semivariance and tail risk hedging are more effective than volatility risk hedging, but more expensive. Oil exporters (Brazil and Russia) outperform importers (India and China) in terms of hedging effectiveness. Hedging costs are lower during COVID-19 than during the global financial crisis. It is critical to capture volatility dynamics for hedging volatility, downside, and tail risk. Over-hedging could significantly increase the risk of an equity-oil-hedged portfolio. The findings contribute to a better understanding of oil's risk hedging capacity for equity indices, which will be of interest to financial market participants, corporations, and regulators. © 2023 Elsevier Ltd
ABSTRACT
This study conducted the econometric analysis to test the hedge and safe haven effects of Non-fungible Tokens (NFTs) on major traditional asset markets in the global financial system. We investigate the estimates of these effects in times of extreme market conditions and the COVID-19 crisis. Our empirical results show evidence of the hedge and safe haven properties of NFTs, confirming two main findings: (i) NFTs act as a hedge and safe haven for particular stock markets and oil, bond, and USD indices, even though the degree of effects varies across asset classes;and (ii) NFTs also serve as sheltering facilities for the markets mentioned above, with more substantial safe haven benefits for bond and USD indices during the recent pandemic crisis. © 2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
ABSTRACT
PurposeThis paper aims to examine the hedge, diversifier and safe haven properties of the global listed infrastructure sector and subsector indices against two traditional asset classes, stocks and bonds, and four alternative asset classes, including commodities, real estate, private equity and hedge funds during extreme negative stock market movements.Design/methodology/approachUsing dynamic conditional correlation and quantile regression, the authors analyze a data set of 12 indices comprising listed infrastructure and traditional asset classes from 2010 to 2019.FindingsOverall, the findings indicate that listed infrastructure acts as an effective diversifier but not as a strong safe haven or hedge when considered in a multiasset context. With minor exceptions, listed infrastructure cannot be concluded as a safe haven against other asset classes under investigation.Practical implicationsThe present study has implications for institutional investors looking to incorporate infrastructure in their multiasset portfolios for increased portfolio diversification benefits.Originality/valueDespite the increased influence of infrastructure as an asset class, to the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the hedge, safe haven and diversifying properties of infrastructure in a multi-asset context.
ABSTRACT
This paper introduces a unique perspective towards Bitcoin safe haven and hedge properties through the Bitcoin halving cycle. The Bitcoin halving cycle suggests that Bitcoin price movement follows specific sequences, and Bitcoin price movement is independent of other assets. This has significant implications for Bitcoin properties, encompassing its risk profile, volatility dynamics, safe haven properties, and hedge properties. Bitcoin's institutional and industrial adoption gained traction in 2021, while recent studies suggest that gold lost its safe haven properties against the S&P500 in 2021 amid signs of funds flowing out of gold into Bitcoin. Amid multiple forces at play (COVID-19, halving cycle, institutional adoption), the potential existence of regime changes should be considered when examining volatility dynamics. Therefore, the objective of this study is twofold. The first objective is to examine gold and Bitcoin safe haven and hedge properties against three US stock indices before and after the stock market selloff in March 2020. The second objective is to examine the potential regime changes and the symmetric properties of the Bitcoin volatility profile during the halving cycle. The Markov Switching GARCH model was used in this study to elucidate regime changes in the GARCH volatility dynamics of Bitcoin and its halving cycle. Results show that gold did not exhibit safe haven and hedge properties against three US stock indices after the COVID-19 outbreak, while Bitcoin did not exhibit safe haven or hedge properties against the US stock market indices before or after the COVID-19 pandemic market crash. Furthermore, this study also found that the regime changes are associated with low and high volatility periods rather than specific stages of a Bitcoin halving cycle and are asymmetric. Bitcoin may yet exhibit safe haven and hedge properties as, at the time of writing, these properties may manifest through sustained adoption growth. © 2023 by the authors.
ABSTRACT
This paper examines the impact of COVID-19 on five of the world's most liquid futures markets. The results of our wavelet coherence analysis for spot futures reveal two important findings. First, spot futures coherence movements during the pandemic period are influential at both low and high frequency scales. Second, the spectrogram shows mixed causality directions at all scales of observation in the period before and during the pandemic. In terms of hedging effectiveness, OLS and VECM show improvements in hedging effectiveness. Nevertheless, multiscale analysis with wavelet methods shows that hedging effectiveness depends on the hedge period due to the instability of the spot-futures association during the pandemic period. Our results refute the conventional wisdom among finance scholars that a stronger link between spot and futures markets during the crisis improves hedging effectiveness. We would emphasise that investment baskets and hedge pairs should be reviewed frequently to optimise results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Investment Analysts Journal is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
ABSTRACT
The latest threat to global health is an ongoing outbreak of a respiratory disease known as COVID-19 and has become a global concern. The exponential spread of the COVID-19 pandemic shook up global markets and caused major adjustments to the world economy. In this paper, we investigate whether these changes affected hedge fund return patterns. We decompose hedge fund index returns into Fama-French factors using data from 2017 - 2019 and compare it to decompositions using data from 2020 and 2021 to date. Our empirical results suggest that the Fama-French factor exposures changed on the conventional hedge funds. This has reflected that COVID-19 has an impact on the return patterns of the hedge funds we selected. The findings have implications for investors and major players in the investment markets. Our research is useful for predicting how the performance of hedge funds changes in market disruption. © 2022 ACM.
ABSTRACT
This article examines the recent short squeeze of the GameStop (GME) stock in early 2021. This event, although not the only case of short squeeze, has some idiosyncratic features that makes it extremely interesting, mainly because it was organized by non-institutional investors through social media like Reddit. Using intraday data during the period 4/1/2021-26/3/2021, we conclude that volume and Google searches provide useful information which enable us to explain the GME performance. Moreover, we show that information on volume and Google searches can provide investors with valuable data, but the faster investors have access to this information, the greater the advantages. This analysis could be very useful for scholars and practitioners who examine profitable investment strategies when such conditions emerge in the markets, and it also provides some thoughts for regulators regarding the impact of networks, social or not, on the stability of the financial markets.
ABSTRACT
PurposeThis study aims to investigate the safe-haven and hedging properties of Bitcoin against a wide variety of conventional assets before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.Design/methodology/approachThis paper uses a smooth transition regression (STR) to jointly test the hedging properties of Bitcoin in normal conditions and Bitcoin's safe-haven properties in extreme stock market conditions.FindingsHighlighting the results, the authors show that Bitcoin is able to provide safe-haven feature during the COVID-19 pandemic period while Bitcoin serves as a hedge tool in the pre-COVID-19 pandemic period. The findings also show that the prowess of the safe-haven/hedge nature is sensitive to the type of the asset market and the time horizon when switching from daily to weekly frequency data.Originality/valueThis is one of the first studies that conduct a combined analysis of the safe-haven and hedging capabilities of Bitcoin against several asset classes using an STR method. This study uses the longest sample period to yet, allowing researchers to examine Bitcoin's safe-haven and hedging features both before and after the COVID-19 pandemic.
ABSTRACT
Risk and return are two fundamentals that have an impact on an investor's or hedger's investing choices. Based on the proposed synchronous movement intensity index, this paper aims to improve the hedging performance by adjusting the model-driven hedge ratio and realize the trade-off between return and risk in futures hedging. First, without loss of generality, we forecast crude oil spot and futures volatility using 10 GARCH-type models, including three linear models and seven nonlinear models, to obtain the ex-ante hedging ratio under the minimum variance framework. Then, we develop a novel and tractable method to identify the market state based on the index of consistency intensity, in which the index portrays the synchronous degree of stock price movements in the energy sector. Last but not least, we propose the hedge ratio adjustment criteria based on the identified state, and adjust the ratio driven by GARCH-type models of futures in accordance with the market state. Empirical results of crude oil futures markets indicate that the proposed state-dependent hedging model is superior to the commonly used models in terms of three criteria including mean of returns, variance, and ratio of mean to variance of returns for measuring hedging effect. We apply the DM test to make a statistical inference and discover that while the mean and the ratio of mean to variance of returns are increasing, the variance and hedging effectiveness of the hedged portfolio based on the modified methods are not significantly affected. Furthermore, the superiority of the proposed method is robust to different market conditions, including significant rising or falling trends, large basis, and COVID-19 pandemic. We also test the robustness of the proposed method with respect to the baseline model, quantile, and evaluation window. Overall, this paper provides a more realistic approach for crude oil risk managers to hedge crude oil price risk, some corresponding implications are also concluded. © 2022 Elsevier Ltd